Tuesday, September 29, 2015

I, Crystal Cox ALLEGE that Marc Randazza had intent to defraud Creditors and that the Bankruptcy Courts should not, as a matter of law discharge debt that is FRAUD.

June 3, 2015 was date of the the now infamous arbitration in which Marc Randazza was accused of Bribery and was ordered to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Marc Randazza hired his bankruptcy attorney in June 11, 2015 just after this we see Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza filed for divorce on June 22, 2015. This too shows intent to defraud creditors in my opinion.

Meanwhile he stalled the Randazza v. Cox in multiple ways and now this bankruptcy has "stayed" that case for who knows how long.

I ALLEGE that Marc J. Randazza made fraudulent transfers of money and other assets and set up an array of trusts, mortgage, car buying spree, IRA's, 401k and more simply to defraud Creditors and with specific intent to do so.

I ALLEGE that Marc Randazza began planning his bankruptcy seriously in March of 2015, once he new he would lose to Liberty Media and that the District of Nevada courts was allowing me, Crystal Cox to have 10 million in counter claims against Marc Randazza.


I Allege that Marc Randazza does not believe he will lose in those counterclaims and that he will continue to badger me or out-lawyer me and I will lose. I have clear and convincing claims, however, the point here is that Randazza added my counterclaims and me as a Creditor because of it's size of 10 MILLION Dollars and this put him at a Chapter 11 vs. a Chapter 13 I believe, or in some way made his story seem more plausible with so much burden. Even though he has stalled my case successfully with his appeals and now this, I allege, fraudulent bankruptcy claim.

I allege that Marc Randazza is using the ownership of Randazza Legal Group to hide assets, using IRA's and other financial accounts he started deliberately to defraud creditors with malicious, willful intent.

Creditors such as Liberty Media and myself, Crystal Cox are not just some Creditor, we were clients, and should have had protection under law, under the bar Association, under Randazza's multi-state liability insurance carrier which he refused and the Nevada courts let him, to ever give me information on who that carrier is or was.

The courts, including the bankruptcy courts should protect clients of attorneys such as Marc Randazza and not let them commit fraud against their clients, or engage in unethical, unconstitutional actions that really do harm their clients and then seek some sort of immunity in the bankruptcy courts.

RANDAZZA took a BRIBE, and I allege this is a tiny, TINY legal infraction of which Randazza has committed a massive amount of this type of action, plus other illegal hacking, stalking, privacy violations, endangerment and flat out criminal defamation and harassment against his former clients and against whistleblowers who tell on him.

I allege that Randazza's divorce is to hide money, assets and even a mortgage to his wife's parents to defraud creditors whose lives he has caused irreparable harm to.


Research Links to the above documents

June 3, 2015 Arbitration
http://www.libertyvsrandazza.com/IAA_Award_Against_Randazza.PDF

June 11, 2015 Marc Randazza retained his now bankruptcy attorney. See Below
http://ia601505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.18.0.pdf


I, Crystal Cox Allege that Marc Randazza has violated Section 548 of the Bankruptcy Code and other Codes to due with fraud. I allege that Randazza had intent to defraud Creditors and therefore he cannot discharge this debt. I allege Marc Randazza is guilty of Fraudulent Transference and Fraudulent Transfers.

"A transfer of the debtor’s property to another party in order to deter, hinder or defraud a creditor, or to unfairly place such property out of the reach of a creditor is a fraudulent transfer. In bankruptcy cases, a trustee is given the power to set aside or avoid these transfers under either federal law or state law. Section 548 of the Bankruptcy Code provides for the federal statutory basis to challenge fraudulent transfers. Section 544 of the Bankruptcy Code provides for the basis to challenge fraudulent transfers under applicable state statutory law.

There are two types of fraudulent transfers in bankruptcy. The first is actual fraud, which involves the intent to defraud creditors. The second is referred to as a constructive fraud, which involves a transfer made in exchange for inadequate consideration.

Actual fraud requires proof of intent from the person challenging the transfer. While intent must be determined on a case-by-case basis, a few examples might include the transfer of all the debtor’s assets to a newly formed company or to a family member to avoid the reach of creditors or litigation threatened against the debtor unless the property is transferred. Even involuntary transfers can be made with actual intent."

Source and Full Article
http://www.law360.com/articles/553894/understanding-fraudulent-transfers-and-ensuing-litigation
ALLEGED OF COURSE

I, Crystal L. Cox am Creditor Number 13 in the Ol' Marc John Randazza Bankrutpcy Fiasco and I mailed thisOBJECTION to the District of Nevada Bankruptcy Courts.

Here is a Part of it, the Whole Filing I mailed is linked below.

"Debt cannot be Discharged due to Fraud

Crystal Cox claims that Marc John Randazza premeditated this bankruptcy to avoid losing assets. Marc Randazza knew he was going to use bankruptcy to stop or get rid of pending cases against him whereby he actually committed fraud against former clients.

Crystal Cox alleges this is fraud and that debt cannot be discharged in fraud. 

Marc Randazza stalled Cox’s counterclaims in the District of Nevada case by appealing a Judge’s ruling to the Ninth Circuit regarding Anti-Slapp laws in Nevada which he personally co-wrote.

This stayed the District of Nevada case pending the Ninth Circuit appeal decision. Randazza was to file an opening brief in that case in August of 2015, however he extended the filing deadline, then on August 28th, 2015 he filed bankruptcy. Randazza then filed this Bankruptcy Notice of filing in the Ninth Circuit case and thereby froze those proceedings as well.

Cox claims that Randazza premeditated these actions and planned a bankruptcy all along, and stalled in order to create trusts, spend money, hide money offshore, file for a divorce to hide money with his wife and her family and make it look like he simply, one day, could not pay his creditors nor be liable to the clients he had intentionally harmed.

Randazza continued to harm his clients and all the while knowing he was creating a massive liability. Cox’s claims against Marc Randazza are clear and convincing, they are valid and the case has been going on since Nov of 2012, nearly 3 years now.

As of January 2015 Marc Randazza knew that the Nevada courts was allowing Cox’s counterclaims, so in March of 2015 Marc Randazza begin planning his bankruptcy, he started several family trusts, bought vehicles, and in June he and his wife Jennifer Randazza who also sued Cox but Cox was not allowed to countersue per judicial order, filed for divorce. Cox alleges this too was premeditated in order to defraud creditors and those who have and had legitimate claims against Marc Randazza.

On March 9th, 2015 Marc Randazza set up the Misuraca Family Trust. He also set up Marc J. Randazza P.A as another entity and this 100% owned by the Misuraca Family Trust.

ALL this to attempt to move forward as a lawyer and not pay those he harmed in previous case and or other creditors. This was and is to protect Marc Randazza to maliciously, willfully and intentionally cheat clients, cause client harm, ruin clients business and quality of life and then simply file bankruptcy and move on as an attorney and hid his assets from those folks (creditors and clients who sued him for malpractice).

Magnolia Holdings 19 LLC is owned by Marc Randazza, Jennifer Randazza and Ronald Green, Randazza’s business partner who represents Marc Randazza and Jennifer Randazza in their lawsuit against Crystal Cox.

These trusts and this divorce filing, as well as several trips to other countries such as Canada, the UK and other countries, Cox alleges this travel was to hide money and assets, and was done with full intent to defraud Creditors, which includes Cox who has $10,000,000 in legitimate claims against Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. Therefore Cox objects to the discharge of debt.

March 9th, 2015 Marc Randazza buys a $42,000 BMW. Randazza bought a 2013 Sienna for $25,000 and put it in Jennifer Randazza’s name. And Marc Randazza put $26,000 on tuition for private school for his children, even though one of his children was the Plaintiff in the Cox case, which was an immoral, unethical action for Mr. Randazza to have taken.

On August 25th, 2015 Marc Randazza started a 401k account at John Hancock. 3 days later on August 28th, 2015 he filed for bankruptcy. Cox claims this is clearly with intent to commit fraud on the bankruptcy courts and to defraud Creditors who were entitled to be paid.

Marc Randazza started an IRA at LPL Financial for 99,000. 

Marc Randazza created a secured debt of $300,000 with his wife’s parents Denise and Cathy Brochey, of which Cox claims was to defraud creditors and hide assets from his victims.

Cox claims that Randazza created all the above specifically with intent to defraud Creditors.

Cox alleges this was all staged to defraud Creditors.

For all this to happen on the same day March 9th, 2015, is suspect and Cox moves this court to take note that it is odd that all these trusts were set up and a 42,000 BMW was purchased this same day, as well as a 25,000 Toyota Sienna for Jennifer Randazza. "

To View Full Filing, Click Below
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ibw3-G7mhmBhTqwxIyipHHyzWjDrCRU5bGVjmS4xTAg/edit


My CLEAR and Convincing Claims against my former attorney Marc Randazza, with linking Exhibits.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IoVAumRSyJ6foBTnlM1MUGw3h1z5Xo9xuZvJ_VEgjPY/edit



A Bit more on Bankruptcy Fraud, Fraudulent Transfers and ...


Cox alleges that Marc Randazza has INTENT TO DEFRAUD and therefore he cannot discharge his debt in this bankruptcy case. I claim Marc Randazza had ACTUAL INTENT and in my case he even transfered assets to who I claim is a counter defendant in Randazza v. Cox, his wife Jennifer Randazza whom was / is a Plaintiff in that case as is their young daughter.

More on this topic
http://www.maclaw.com/universal-concepts-of-fraudulent-transfer-law-intent-to-defraud-part-1-of-2/


Hiding Property & Assets in Bankruptcy
http://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/bankruptcy/hiding-property-assets.html


Much more COMING SOON

Did Marc Randazza really list Alexandra Mayers as some sort of possible future income?

I am not sure why Marc Randazza listed as a possible asset or future "In Money" claims against Monica Foster aKa Alexandra Mayers. The way I remember it Jennifer Randazza MALICIOUSLY sued her in an unconstitutional Trademark lawsuit in Clark County, Randazza Legal Group represents her and Mr. Randazza was not a party was he? Hmm I must have that wrong as there it is in the sworn to be true bankruptcy document that possible money coming to this hypocrtical, I allege corrupt jackass attorney, is from a lawsuit where his wife whom is in a divorce with him is the suing party, the MALICIOUS Plaintiff.

Page 11 at Link Below
Randazza v. Mayers
A-14-699072-C

Defendant
Mayers, Alexandra Melody  Also Known As  Foster, Monica

Plaintiff
Randazza, Jennifer





http://ia601505.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854/gov.uscourts.nvb.348854.15.0.pdf

So now how in the world is Marc Randazza claiming this case to have "Possible Interest"?

Well for one, I allege the bankruptcy is a sham, and was done with malicious intent to defraud creditors and that Jennifer Randazza is going to be hiding assets and interest for MR Randazza, oh and the attorney is Ronald Green of Randazza Legal Group. Who I also allege is aiding and abetting Marc Randazza to commit bankruptcy fraud.

The case was / is a  malicious willful LIE to retaliate against Alexandra Mayers for reporting the TRUTH about Marc Randazza and his associates. 

The case is unethical, is unconstitutional and violated the rights of Alexandra Mayers. And if the case is WON by some unconstitutional LAWLESS Judicial Ruling, well then how the hell does Marc Randazza have interest?

Oh yeah he lied and committed fraud on the court, he made his wife sue Alexandra Mayers just as he made his wife and infant child sue me. All to shut us up for exposing what is now coming out as clearly FACT and undeniable TRUTH.

So does Marc Randazza have INTEREST in the Above Case?
You Bet he Does? But is that Legal?

MUCH MUCH More on this at a later time.

Sunday, September 13, 2015

Porn News Today, Monica Foster Reporting; Randazza – the porn attorney associated with the Free Speech Coalition, Xbiz & a pedophile – just filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy

"

Arbitrator: Marc Randazza must pay $600K+ for “clear and serious breaches of fiduciary duty” against his former client

Update 2
9/4/2015
On 8/28/2015 Marc Randazza filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. He listed 1-10 million as estimated assets and 10-50 million as estimated liabilities (that’s why Chapter 13 is not an option). As a result, the Clark County case (a petition to confirm the arbitration award) was automatically stayed / administratively closed. This situation is tricky: Randazza essentially declared that the arbitration is so burdensome that bankruptcy is the only choice. However, he implied it before the said arbitration was finalized, and the bankruptcy is seemingly aimed at preventing the finalization. So expect Liberty to continue pushing for the final arbitration decision (moving to resume the closed case).
Marc Randazza attended a luncheon with the leader of the Free Speech Coalition (Diane Duke), which was hosted by internationally known convicted pedophile August Kurt Brackob aka Kurt Treptow
Marc Randazza attended a luncheon with the leader of the Free Speech Coalition (Diane Duke), which was hosted by internationally known convicted pedophile August Kurt Brackob aka Kurt Treptow

MetArt Sues XVideos for Infringement (Xvideos is repped by Randazza?)

The lawsuit, filed by industry attorneys Clyde DeWitt and Spencer Freeman, seeks a restraining order, damages, attorneys fees and the cost of corrective advertising.
Industry attorney Marc Randazza, who represents XVideos and the other defendants, told XBIZ today that he doubts the case has legs.
“While I respect MetArt and its counsel, I think that the filing has some significant deficiencies, and the theories of the case are flawed,” he said.
But Freeman, who represents MetArt,said that the legal argument is clear in this case.
Freeman told XBIZ: “XVideos traded on MetArt trade names and failed to take down their copyrighted content when asked. It’s not theory, it’s fact.”
In addition to the lawsuit against XVideos and related websites, MetArt has filed numerous other infringement claims against the operators of Sex.com, AdultPornVideoxx.com, JoJoBaa.net, Motherless.com, KPorno.com, Pornias.com, LikePorno.com, SpankBang.com, Porn69.biz, Porn69.org, PornHub88.com, Sex88.org, PornoWow.com, Tubenn.com, Wixvi.so, Wixvi.com, HDPorn1080.com, HDPorn1080.net, SexTVx.com, SexSeeVideo.net and PornVideoXO.com.
MetArt lawsuits have been filed at federal courts in Miami, Phoenix, Seattle, Los Angeles and now Las Vegas.�
MetArt’s membership websites include MetArt. com, SexArt.com, Errotica-Archives.com, EroticBeauty.com, TheLifeErotic.com, RylskyArt.com, MichealNinn.com, ALSScan.com, VivThomas.com, EternalDesire.com, Stunning18.com, HollyRandall.com, Domai.com, GoddessNudes.com, MagikSex.com and BBFilms.com.

When You Lay Down With Dogs… (South doesn’t mention Randazza anywhere in this posting even though Randazza reps the defendants in the MetArt case)

As I look at the chatter on the webmaster boards about the MetArt lawsuit against Manwin/MindGeek I am reminded of my days managing a strip club, you guys will all know what I am talking about because we have all seen it in one for or another  all of us male, female, straight. gay, republican, democrat.
You see you have all of these people that supported Manwin and the tubesites saying shit like adapt or die blah blah…all had found a way to profit using the tubesites, never mind that they exchanged dollars for pennies.
I remember a stripper who had a boyfriend but that didn’t matter much to her, she cheated with anyone that struck her fancy.  One guy spent a lot of money on her over time, knowing she had a boyfriend but doing his best to “steal her away”  eventually the boyfriend had enough and dumped her and when he did the persistent customer was next in line to, hell lets say it like it was…support her.  We were in the office when a guy asked him why he would want her, after all he knew she was cheating on her boyfriend with him.
His answer…”She wouldn’t do that to ME”  as if somehow he were different.  Turns out he wasn’t and she did do that to him and he was actually surprised by this.
So here we have Mansef/Manwin/MindGeek who built their empire by stealing content and monetizing that stolen content, now you have these webmasters who are astounded that MindGeek would fuck them over….SmackMyFuckingHead!
for those of you who wonder why I always use all of MindGeeks names when writing about them….simple  they try to hide previous sirty shit they did by changing names…I want to make sure people who land her via a search engine, know who they REALLY are and what they really do  and that is no small number.
We have lots of saying here in the south that I like and one of them applies here
When you lay down with dogs, don’t be surprised when you wake up with fleas."

Source
http://www.pornnewstoday.com/pnt/2015/09/11/randazza-the-porn-attorney-associated-with-the-free-speech-coalition-xbiz-a-pedophile-just-filed-for-chapter-11-bankruptcy/

Sunday, September 6, 2015

Clark County Las Vegas Nevada case # A-15-719901-C; Excelsior Media Corp, Plaintiff(s) vs. Marc Randazza, Defendant(s). Unethical Scum Attorney Marc Randazza files bankruptcy to stop proceedings against him in Nevada, or so it seems.


"On 6/15/2015 the studios filed a petition to confirm arbitration award in the Clark County Court in Las Vegas (search by party “Randazza” or case # A-15-719901-C). This court, like the majority of other local courts, doesn’t provide online access to documents. According to the case page, Randazza represents himself while the plaintiffs are represented byWendy Krincek. The hearing on plantiffs’ and defendant’s motions is set to 7/23/2015."

Source
http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/2015/07/09/marc-randazza-must-pay-600k-for-clear-and-serious-breaches-of-fiduciary-duty-against-his-former-client/comment-page-1/


Excelsior Media Corp, Plaintiff(s) vs. Marc Randazza, Defendant(s)
case # A-15-719901-C

Clark County Las Vegas Nevada case # A-15-719901-C

Ya Know Clark County Nevada where Dazed Dipshit Randazza sued Monica Foster / Alexandria Mayers to SUPPRESS her Speech speaking critical of his SLUT wife? Oh and claiming Trademark Violations on her parody and deciding it ok to ruin her life, just because he got his big boy panties in a wad.

And Clark County where April of 2012 Marc Randazza got a protective order against me, Crystal Cox, or at least filed to try and get one, ALL to SUPPRESS my SPEECH calling his wife a slut, griping about him, reviewing his company and expressing my First Amendment Rights.


Register of Actions
Case No. A-15-719901-C
Excelsior Media Corp, Plaintiff(s) vs. Marc Randazza, Defendant(s)

Case Type: Other Civil Matters
Date Filed: 06/15/2015

Location: Department 24
Cross-Reference Case Number: A719901


Defendant Randazza, Marc J Marc J. Randazza, ESQ
  Retained
702-420-2001(W)

Plaintiff Excelsior Media Corp Wendy Krincek
  Retained
7028628800(W)

Plaintiff Gibson, Jason Wendy Krincek
  Retained
7028628800(W)

Plaintiff Liberty Media Holdings LLC Wendy Krincek
  Retained




  OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
06/15/2015  Petition to Confirm
Plaintiffs' Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
06/15/2015  Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
06/15/2015  Opposition
Opposition to Plaintiff's Request for an Order Shortening Time and Motion for Continuance
06/16/2015  Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
Initial Appearance Fee Disclosure
06/17/2015  Reply in Support
Supplement/Reply in Support of Motion to Extend Time
06/19/2015  Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Plaintiff's Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
06/19/2015  Reply in Support
Plaintiff's Reply in Support of their Motion to Confirm arbitration Award on order Shortening Time
06/22/2015  Reply in Support
Plaintiff's Sur-Reply in Support of Their Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award on Order Shortening Time
06/29/2015  Notice of Appearance
Notice of Appearance
07/01/2015  Motion
Defendant's Motion On An Order Shortening Time For: (1) An Extension Of Time To File A Motion To Vacate, Modify, And/Or Correct Plaintiffs' Arbitration Award; (2) An Extension Of Time To Oppose Plaintiffs' Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award And Plaintiffs' Related Filings; And (3) A Continuance Of The Hearing On Plainitffs' Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award
07/02/2015  Order
Order to Appear
07/06/2015  Opposition
Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion on Order Shortening time for: (1) an extension of time to file a motion to vacate, modify, and/or correct plaintiff's arbitration award; (2) an extension of time to oppose Plaintiff's motion to Confirm arbitration award and plaintiff's related filings; and on plaintiff's motion to confirm arbitration award
07/08/2015  Reply in Support
Defendant's Reply in Support of His Motion on an Order Shortening Time for (1) An Extension of Time to File A Motion to Vacate, Modify and/or Correct Plaintiffs' Arbitration Award; (2) An Extension of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and Plaintiffs Related Filings; and (3) A Continuance of the Hearing on Plaintiffs Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
07/09/2015  Hearing  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Crockett, Jim)
Hearing Re: Order to Appear to Establish Briefing Schedule
Parties Present
Minutes
Result: Briefing Schedule Set
07/22/2015  Order
Order Regarding July 9, 2015 Hearing to Establish Briefing Schedule
07/23/2015  Notice of Entry of Order
Notice of Entry of Order
08/07/2015  Motion for Leave to File
Motion for leave to brief that exceeds page limitation pursuant to EDCR 2.20
08/07/2015  Opposition
Defendants Opposition to Plaintiff's motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and Counter-Motion to Vacate and/or Modify
08/24/2015  Motion for Leave to File
Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Brief that Exceeds Page Limitation Pursuant to EDCR 2.20
08/24/2015  Reply in Support
Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Their Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and Opposition to Defendant's Countermotion to Vacate and/or Modify
08/25/2015  Errata
Plaintiffs Errata to their Reply in Support of their Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and Opposition to Defendant's Countermotion to Vacate and/or Modify
08/31/2015  Notice
Notice of Suggestion Pendancy on Bankrupty for Marc J. Randazza Auto Stay of Proceeding
09/01/2015  Order to Statistically Close Case
Civil Order to Statistically Close Case
09/03/2015  CANCELED   Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Crockett, Jim)
Vacated - Case Closed
Plaintiffs' Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
09/03/2015  CANCELED   Motion  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Crockett, Jim)
Vacated - Case Closed
Defendant's Motion On An Order Shortening Time For: (1) An Extension Of Time To File A Motion To Vacate, Modify, And/Or Correct Plaintiffs' Arbitration Award; (2) An Extension Of Time To Oppose Plaintiffs' Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award And Plaintiffs' Related Filings; And (3) A Continuance Of The Hearing On Plainitffs' Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award
09/03/2015  CANCELED   Opposition and Countermotion  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Crockett, Jim)
Vacated - Case Closed
Defendants Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and Counter-Motion to Vacate and/or Modify
09/08/2015  CANCELED   Motion for Leave  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Crockett, Jim)
Vacated - Case Closed
Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Brief that Exceeds Page Limitation Pursuant to EDCR 2.20
09/24/2015  CANCELED   Motion for Leave  (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Crockett, Jim)
Vacated - Case Closed
Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file Brief that Exceeds Page Limitation Pursuant to EDCR 2.20

*****

Also Check Out
https://twitter.com/RandazzaExposed

Meanwhile in Randazza v. Cox he filed an appeal to the Ninth to try and dismiss my counterclaims. Simply a stall tactic as I have VALID claims, he is hiding money it seems and assets, and well who knows what his liability insurance carriers know or are doing, they do not seem to have an attorney in all this and CLEARLY Randazza has massive liabilities in all this to many.

Here is the Randazza / Cox Docket. Nearly 3 years later and YES this case is still going on too. And I have refused to settle. The TRUTH will SHINE BRIGHT.

DOCKET
http://ia600304.us.archive.org/9/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html

STAY TUNED.

District of Nevada Bankruptcy; Marc John RANDAZZA. Judge August B. Landis. Filing for Bankruptcy? Well I don't think that is going to help ya with ALL your PROBLEMS.

Marc Randazza under legal fire from so many sides and decides to file bankruptcy. But how will this help him with claims of taking bribes, that may be jail time right? YEP hope so. And it won't help in claims of defamation or malpractice right? As defamation is assault and you can't file bankruptcy right?? or so he told me on my case. And malpractice has a mandatory 2 million in liability covering in every state he is licensed right? Hmmm...

Well here is the Marc John Randazza bankruptcy filing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibWxzSDNyMm9NQ3c/view?usp=drive_web

Also Check Out
http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/